In a world increasingly governed by fear rather than facts, recent discussions around the regulation of “non-powder guns” [whatever that is?] have highlighted a concerning trend in legislative overreach. Attorney Tom Grieve, an ex-criminal prosecutor and staunch Second Amendment advocate, recently tackled this issue on his YouTube channel, @AttyTomGrieve.

In his video, “WHAT?! Gun Controllers to BAN BB, Nerf, & Pellet Guns? Too CRAZY to be True, right? Wrong,” Tom lays bare the absurdity of targeting toys and recreational items under the guise of public safety.

Tom Grieve’s analysis begins by debunking the myth propagated by anti-gun groups that “non-powder guns” pose a significant threat to public safety.

He cites statistics such as “BB guns and pellet rifles cause an average of at least four deaths per year,” juxtaposing this with more common causes of death that remain unregulated, such as accidents involving ladders or bicycles, which claim far more lives annually. This comparison starkly illustrates the disproportionate response to a relatively minor issue, spotlighting the hysteria rather than rational policy-making.

Meanwhile, a recent Washington Examiner article, “Having Learned Nothing From The Elections, Democrats Turn Left Again,” discussing the Democrats’ post-2024 election stance, serves as a perfect parallel to the overreach on toy guns. In it the article criticizes the Democratic Party for not learning from their electoral defeat, continuing to push unpopular policies, especially regarding immigration and crime.

This stubborn adherence to failed strategies and overlooking of actual voter concerns mirrors the misguided focus on regulating ‘non-powder guns’—both are symptomatic of a broader disconnect from practical and pressing issues.

For instance, while cities like Los Angeles and states like California pledge sanctuary for illegal immigrants regardless of criminal status, families across America are bewildered by the intensifying focus on plastic gun toys instead of addressing rising crime rates or economic challenges. This skewed prioritization not only strains public resources but also erodes trust in governmental decision-making.

Such legislative endeavors are more about control than safety. The push to regulate “non-powder guns”, as highlighted in the video, is less about preventing injuries and more about expanding governmental reach into the minutiae of daily life. This sentiment is echoed in the public’s reaction to Democrats’ handling of broader national issues, where the emphasis on ideologically driven policies overshadows more effective solutions that could address genuine societal needs.

Both the push for “non-powder gun” regulation and the Democratic Party’s post-election strategies reflect a concerning trend towards overreach and misalignment with public sentiment. As Grieve aptly points out through his critical analysis, effective governance should prioritize genuine safety and public interest over political agendas. Policymakers must recalibrate their focus towards issues that truly matter to the electorate, ensuring that legislative efforts enhance, rather than inhibit, the quality of life for ordinary Americans.

Sri Lanka, Air Rifles & Gun Control: Arrogant & Ignorance on Display

New Jersey Politicians Enact Largest Gun Ban in U.S. History