The Hearing Protection Act (HPA) might be in trouble in the House Ways and Means Committee, and anti-gun lobbyists are NOT the ones holding it up.
David Kustoff (R-TN) has been actively pushing to lower the tax stamp to $5 from $200, which would be a welcome change, but the better alternative is to remove suppressors completely from the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA). That would eliminate the tax stamp fee and remove all other NFA requirements.
This option is the best option for gun owners, yet he is pushing the latter and is against the elimination of suppressors from the NFA.
Rep Kustoff’s constituents include a substantial percentage of gun owners. His push to keep suppressors on the NFA does not make sense unless outside forces are putting pressure on his office to lower the fee to $5 instead of completely removing them from the NFA. Anti-gun groups would be lobbying to keep the status quo, meaning the pressure is most likely coming from the pro-gun side. AmmoLand News has been provided with the name of the lobbyist pushing for a fee reduction instead of elimination from the NFA by our sources inside the House Ways and Means Committee.
It is a name that should be familiar to most in the gun rights community….
Heavy lobbying is being done by the former head of the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), Chris Cox, a paid lobbyist. Cox is working to lower the tax stamp fee to $5 and keep suppressors on the NFA!
The current NRA-ILA has pushed for the removal of suppressors from the NFA, and Cox’s actions are contrary to that stance. Mr. Cox no longer has any connections to the NRA. Mr. Cox has also lobbied for a gun company that produces suppressors, which has strongly advocated removing silencers from the NFA, and could make millions of dollars if the hearing protection item is delisted from the NFA.
It is unclear if Chris Cox is advocating for a specific client of his lobbying firm, Capitol 6 Advisors, or if this is a personal issue for him, but Cox seemed to back a rule banning bump stocks under Trump’s first term while heading the NRA-ILA.
“What we’ve said has been very clear: that if something transfers a semi-automatic to function like fully automatic, then those should be regulated as well,” said Chris Cox in a Fox News 2017 interview.
Fast forward to 2025, and a less friendly gun stance would not be out of the norm for Cox, who claims to be a freedom fighter.
The question AmmoLand News is asking is who, if anyone, is paying for the lobbying. AmmoLand News is getting close to that answer, but has not been able to get confirmation of the rumors we are hearing.
Eliminating suppressors from the NFA and reducing the tax fee could both appear as separate provisions in the final markup. If the bill passes the House, the Senate will determine which version to adopt if that happens. While this isn’t the ideal outcome, it’s far better than having the language removing suppressors from the NFA excluded entirely, leaving only the lesser $5 tax stamp option on the table.
Gun Owners still have time to pressure Kustoff and other House Ways and Means Committee members to include the original text of the HPA without the option of just lowering the tax stamp fee to $5. This HPA bill is the closest gun owners have ever been to dismantling part of the NFA. Lobbyists have a lot of power on the Hill, but gun owners have real power to vote those out who have bent the knee to special interests, and it is time these politicians hear from the Second Amendment Community that they need to do the right thing.
At this late date, phone calls are best.
Take Action:
Subject: Support the Full Hearing Protection Act – Remove Suppressors from the NFA
Dear Representative,
As a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, I urge you to support the original language of the Hearing Protection Act (HPA) and REMOVE suppressors entirely from the National Firearms Act of 1934—not just reduce the tax stamp to $5.
Gun owners don’t want a bargain on bad policy—we want real reform. Lowering the fee keeps suppressors under unnecessary and unconstitutional regulation. Removing them from the NFA is the right move for safety, freedom, and common sense.
Please stand with gun owners, not lobbyists. Support the full Hearing Protection Act and remove suppressors from the NFA.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[City, State]
Ways and Means Committee Contact Information:
Ways and Means Committee
U.S. House of Representatives
1102 Longworth House Office Building
Washington D.C. 20515
Phone:(202) 225-3625
Fax: (202) 225-5680
AmmoLand News reached out to Rep Kustoff’s office for comment, but has not received a response.
HPA and SHORT Act Stalled in Committee, Last Chance for Gun Owners to Act
Calls Growing for NRA Board to Repudiate Bump Stock Statement
About John Crump
John is an NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.
