Opinion
Colorado’s controversial new law, Assault Weapons Ban SB25-003, is sparking significant concern among pro-Second Amendment advocates. Signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in April and set to take effect on August 1, 2026, the legislation imposes extensive new restrictions on the purchase, sale, and ownership of various semiautomatic firearms.
SB25-003 prohibits commercial sales of semiautomatic rifles and shotguns equipped with detachable magazines and gas-operated handguns that accept detachable magazines. Firearms exempted include .22 caliber rimfire rifles with tubular magazines and bolt—or lever-action rifles, which are seen as posing lower safety risks.
Under the law, individuals who wish to purchase these restricted firearms must navigate a complex new “permission” process.
Requirements include completing a state-approved firearm safety course [which doesn’t exist yet], passing an extensive background check, and receiving approval from local sheriffs. Sheriffs can deny permits based on totally subjective assessments of applicants, though denied individuals have the option to appeal.
Jon Kelly, chairman of the Pitkin County Republicans, strongly opposes the law. “It’s insane,” Kelly stated. “This essentially bans almost all semiautomatic firearms, putting heavy burdens on responsible gun owners who now face recurring training mandates and increased government oversight.”
Jonathan Melnick, owner of Basalt Firearms, questioned the bill’s effectiveness, criticizing it as an emotional rather than logical response to tragedies such as the Aurora theater shooting. “Would banning SUVs stop incidents of drivers attacking pedestrians?” he remarked, emphasizing the failure of the bill to address the root causes of violence.
Additionally, concerning to gun owners, is the creation of a government-controlled registry via the permitting system, raising fears of future misuse or confiscation efforts.
Paying To Ban Yourself
Funding for this restrictive program controversially comes from Colorado Parks and Wildlife’s Outdoor Parks and Recreation Fund, supported by hunting licenses, fishing permits, and state park fees. Critics highlight this as an irony, stating that Colorado sportsmen’s own contributions will finance their disarmament.
State Rep. Elizabeth Velasco (D-Glenwood Springs) defended the bill, framing it as necessary for public safety, but emphasized that it does not apply retroactively. Individuals who currently own restricted firearms are permitted to retain them, but future sales or transfers face stringent limitations.
Despite assurances, Second Amendment supporters argue this law infringes on constitutional rights established in landmark Supreme Court rulings such as District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). Advocacy groups are preparing for legal battles to challenge the law’s constitutionality, and political repercussions are expected to surface in upcoming elections.
“The passage of this bill won’t prevent mass shootings,” noted Lesley Hollywood, a gun rights advocate. It merely burdens law-abiding citizens without addressing real problems.
With significant pushback from Colorado’s rural communities and responsible gun owners, SB25-003’s future remains uncertain, pending legal challenges and potential voter backlash in 2026.
Colorado’s Assault Weapons Ban: Controversial SB25-003 Heads to Governor’s Desk
c
